Focal Point
Mamadou Ndaw
Effective Date
06/04/2018
Planned Review Date
31/12/2027
Version
2.0
The Select Responsible Parties and Grantees policy, Responsible Parties procedure and Grantees procedure have been updated to include references to portfolio. The following related templates have been updated:
Following the introduction of the new Portfolio Policy and the Portfolio Document Template, the On-Granting Provisions Applicable to the Implementing Partner template has been updated to reflect portfolio as a new delivery instrument.
The PCAT template has been updated to align with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Policy. The updated PCAT template is published in Step 3.0 of the Responsible Parties Procedure and Step 2.1 Opt of the Grantees Procedure.
The new Self Certification Form for Programming Entities has been included in Step 3 of the Grantees Procedure as a self-certified warranty against bankruptcy, insolvency, unethical practices, and alignment with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Policy for all recipients of funding in a programming context.
The policy has been updated to align references to awards with the Innovation Challenges policy and with the Performance-Based Payments policy.
Clauses 6, 17, and procedure table 1, step 3.0 of the Select Responsible Parties and Grantees chapter have been updated to align with the HACT changes of 1 January 2021. Additionally, the Partner Capacity Assessment Tool (PCAT) has been updated to align with the HACT updated thresholds and also includes procurement capacity assessment for GEF & GCF-funded projects.
The management actions to the OAI GEF Audit that have been completed to date have been uploaded to the POPP. This includes the RACI, the Delegation of Authority Letter and Guidance on GEF Project Revisions.
The policy and procedures of the Select Responsible Parties and Grantees have been aligned with the procurement policy on Engaging CSO/NGO, article 11 - a Responsible Party Agreement (RPA) should be used for engaging all CSOs as Responsible Parties, regardless of how they were selected.
Templates for on-granting clauses added to the policy and operational guidance on low value grants linked to the procedures. (POPP-11-3253, POPP-11-3244, POPP-11-3258).
The Select Responsible Parties and Grantees policy and procedures are now available in French. To access the content, click on the French language tab.
The French Standard Grant Agreement (Micro-Capital Grant) for Non-Credit Related Activities template is now available. To access the document, click on the French language tab (Procedure table 2, step 4).
The Spanish Standard Grant Agreement (Micro-Capital Grant) for Non-Credit Related Activities template is now available. To access the document, click on the Spanish language tab (Procedure table two, step four).
The Select Responsible Parties and Grantees policy and procedures are now available in Spanish. To access the content, click on the Spanish language tab.
The new Partner Capacity Assessment tool was added to steps 3 and 2.1 OPT of the Responsible Parties and Grantees procedures, replacing other assessments that are part of the new streamlined tool.
PDF (800.57 KB)
Reg. 17.01
DOCX (95.36 KB)
1.0
Identify project activities and/or portfolio interventions to be provided by a responsible party.
Project Manager and/or Portfolio Manager
Select a suitable responsible party using the appropriate method.
3.0
Screen the selected responsible party and complete any required capacity assessments instructed by the PCAT.
The PCAT tool is a macro excel file which contains macros. To complete the download of the PCAT, please follow the quick guide under the explanatory notes.
Partner Capacity Assessment tool
Partners’ capacities are assessed through the Partner Capacity Assessment Tool, which assesses the partner management and other capacities. The PCAT is completed for any implementing partner other than UN agencies. (Quick Guide to Downloading the PCAT). Financial capacities are assessed through the HACT micro-assessment if more than $150,000 is expected to be transferred in one year.
4.0
Sign standard agreement with the responsible parties.
Standard LOA between UNDP and a Government Ministry/Institution/IGO on the implementation of a project and/or portfolio when UNDP serves as implementing partner
Private Firm - Contract for Goods/Services
CSO - For collaborative advantage, competitive, and quality-based fixed budget selection as a Responsible Party - RPA
UN Agency to UN Agency Transfer Agreement
Establish grant selection committee (if different from project board and/or portfolio board).
Project Developer and/or Portfolio Developer
Low Value Grants Operational Guidance
Define grant selection criteria.
Note that grant selection criteria are often determined or influenced by the funding source.
Low Value Grants Operational Guidance.
2.1 OPT
Conduct specific implementing partner capacity assessment for on-granting in line with the selection criteria.
The partner capacity assessment tool has a worksheet for on-granting, which is enabled only when on-granting is used. (Quick Guide to Downloading the PCAT).
Solicit grant proposals in line with the project document and/or portfolio document.
Project Manager
Self Certification (Programming Entities)
Both the overall project and/or portfolio purpose and the grant selection criteria should be referenced.
Grant proposals to include the signed Self Certification (Programming Entities)
Selection of grantees and award of grants.
Grant selection committee or project board and/or portfolio board
Low Value Grant agreement
Partner Capacity Assessment Tool
The process of selection is described in the terms of reference of the grant selection committee.
Grantees’ capacities are assessed through the Partner Capacity Assessment Tool, which assesses the grantee management and other capacities. The PCAT is completed for low value grants. (Quick Guide to Downloadingthe PCAT).