Search
Policy Areas

Knowledge Product Production and Quality Assurance

1

Step

Product Design
 

Responsible Party

Issuing Office

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The issuing office identifies the need and elaborates the necessary details (intended impact, target audience, budget, roll out plans, etc.) to guarantee that the knowledge product is clearly justified, targeted and impactful.


These details will be submitted in Form 1 of the online assessment as per step 1.1 of these procedures.

 

For further information on  knowledge product types, life cycle steps, production processes, and quality assurance standards, please see the Knowledge Product Production Guidelines.

1.1

Step

Submit Product Details (Online)

 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The focal point submits the new publication for approval. The focal point inputs in the online quality assurance form the justification for the product, the audience, the budget and other product details. See form sample.

 

1.2

Step

Approve product design

 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

After the submission of Step 1 by the Focal Point, an email soliciting the approval of the new knowledge product is sent to the Approver. The Approver follows the link on the email to the online form and approve the knowledge product details or rejects it.


If it is approved, the knowledge product can then be completed by the Issuing Office. 

 

If the form is rejected, the workflow resumes from step 1.1., where the Knowledge Product Focal Point will review and address the Approver’s comments.

 

2.0

Step

Produce the knowledge product

 

Responsible Party

Issuing Office

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Following the approval of the knowledge product and its details, the issuing office can proceed to produce the product.

 

All products, once finalized in draft, should be subject to critical review.  The product’s type determines the nature of the review, the composition of the reviewers and whether an external review is called for.
 

2.1

Step

Assess quality standards (online)
 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Clearing a knowledge product for publication is to certify that the product meets the quality standards set at Step 2 of the online quality assurance forms. This step is completed on the Knowledge Products Quality Assessment site

 

2.2

Step

Clearance for publication

 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Following the inputs submitted by the Focal Point on the online quality assurance forms, the Approver receives an email notification soliciting the clearance of the form.


The email notification will lead to an online form for final certification that the product meets the quality assurance. The Approver can either “approve” or “reject” the details in the forms.


If the submission is cleared, it will be uploaded first internally (step 3) and subsequently issued on www.undp.org (and any of the appropriate regional and country sub sites)
 

If the form is rejected, the workflow resumes at step 2.1 of these procedures. The Knowledge Product Focal Point then reviews the Approver’s comments and corrects the issue.
 

3.0

Step

Upload the knowledge product

 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Following the Approver's clearance of the knowledge product, the Focal Point will complete “Step 3” of the online quality assurance form. This step is to guarantee that the product details, clearance process, and product itself are documented and uploaded for storage and audit purposes.
 

3.1

Step

Publish the knowledge product

 

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The KM Team (knowledge@undp.org) assists the Issuing Offices and Knowledge Product Focal Points in publishing quality approved knowledge products on UNDP’s public site. 

 

3.2

Step

Roll out the product

 

Responsible Party

Issuing Office

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The issuing office will continue to communicate and roll out plans as indicated in the product’s strategy and details.

 

4.0

Step

Track product’s performance and impact
 

Responsible Party

Knowledge Product Focal Point and Issuing Office

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Track and Monitor the impact of the knowledge product. Consult the Knowledge Product Report (Power BI) User Guide.
 

Managing Corporate Risk

1

Step

Communications & Consultation

Responsible Party

Risk Owner

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Include key stakeholders in risk identification and risk analysis process. Communicate UNDP risk profile to EG through annual reporting cycle.

2

Step

Scope, context and criteria

Responsible Party

Risk Committee

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

3

Step

Risk Assessment:

Identification of Risks

Risk Analysis

Evaluation of Risk

Responsible Party

Risk Committee

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Identify major risks (both threats & opportunities) at corporate level affecting UNDP, twice a year at a minimum.

Review and analyze the overall UNDP risk profile and present to Risk Committee.

Evaluate each risk in the Corporate Risk Register to define the risks that require priority treatment based on UNDP’s risk acceptance in order to meet its objectives in the SP and avoid harm.
 

4

Step

Risk Treatment

Responsible Party

Risk Committee

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Escalate the risks from HQ units & all Bureaux for Risk Committee consideration to make decisions on escalated corporate risks (prioritize them and specific actions to be taken).
 

5

Step

Risk Monitoring & Review

Responsible Party

Risk Owner

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Document the decisions taken by Risk Committee in the Corporate Risk Log, and monitor and update it regularly.
 

6

Step

Risk Recording and Reporting

Responsible Party

Risk Committee

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Records Risks in the ERM risk Register and Report the overall risk profile of UNDP; Prepare a bi-annual report to the EG, based on a strategic analysis of UNDP's overall risk landscape.
 

Managing Unit/Programme-Level Risk (Regional/Central Bureaux)

1

Step

Communications & Consultation

Responsible Party

Risk Owner

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Include key stakeholders in risk identification and risk analysis process. Communicate & consult with relevant parties of the Bureau and the Office at all stages of RM processes and update them at regular/planned intervals.

2

Step

Scope, context and criteria

Responsible Party

Bureau Director

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Integrated in Regional Programme Document; Global Programme Document; Bureau IWP; Office IWP.
 

 

3

Step

Risk Assessment:

Identification of Risks

Risk Analysis

Evaluation of Risk

Responsible Party

Bureau Director

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

In consultation with relevant stakeholders, identify major risks for the overall objectives across COs in the region, Central Bureaux or the Office level, and track in respective IWPs (Risk Register), during programme design and twice a year at a minimum during implementation.
 


Analyze likelihood and impact of programme/unit risks by applying the ERM Criteria Model and record in Risk Register.

Evaluate each risk in the Programme/Unit Risk Register specific to Regional/Central Bureaus to define which risks require priority treatment based on the Bureau & Office’s risk acceptance in order to meet the Programme objectives and avoid harm.

4

Step

Risk Treatment

Responsible Party

Bureau Director/ Designate

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Respond to the COs & Units' escalated risks; Escalate the risks that cannot be adequately addressed by Central/Regional Bureaux, and the Offices to the Risk Committee.

5

Step

Risk Monitoring & Review

Responsible Party

Risk Owner

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Monitor risks at the frequency that is best fit for the risk and complexity of the Programme/Unit. Update Risk Register on bi-annual basis at a minimum. For RBx, ensure risk management being conducted in COs across the region.
 

6

Step

Risk Recording and Reporting

Responsible Party

Bureau Director/ Designate

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Records Risks in the ERM risk register and Report the Bureau and the Offices' major risks bi-annually in IWP and annually in ROAR.
 

Contract Management Module in Quantum

1

Step

The Contract Management Module is designed to automate contract management and enable colleagues working in programme and operations to better track and manage contracts.

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Harassment Formal Complaint Procedure

1

Step

Initiate formal resolution by reporting incident(s) to OAI.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Send email to: reportmisconduct@undp.org

Anyone with information regarding allegations of misconduct can report it using one of the following means:

  • By email to OAI at reportmisconduct@undp.org or directly to the Director, Office of Audit and Investigations, or Deputy Director, Head of Investigations, Office of Audit and Investigations.
  • Through an online form accessible through the "Report fraud, abuse and misconduct" link at www.undp.org
  • Through UNDP's telephone answering system (toll-free):
    • Worldwide: +1-770-776-5678 (with interpreters available 24 hours/day)
    • In the United States: 1-877-557-8685
  • By fax: +1-770-409-5008 (worldwide)
  • By mail addresssed to: Director, Office of Audit and Investigations, or Deputy Director, Head of Investigations, Office of Audit and Investigations, One United Nations Plaza, DC1, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA
  • Use of external sexual harassment helpline for reporting sexual harassment.
     

 
 

 

 


 

 

2

Step

Initial screening.

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

During initial screening, OAI will look at, inter alia, whether the complaint falls within OAI's investigative authority. If it does not, OAI may refer the case to the appropriate entity.  

People reporting misconduct have the option to leave relevant contact information or to remain anonymous. An anonymous complaint should contain enough detailed information to allow OAI to obtain independent corroboration of the facts. If there is no way to independently corroborate the information provided by the anonymous source, OAI will not be able to investigate the complaint and may be required to close the case.  

Individuals are encouraged to be as specific as possible, including the basic details of who, what, where, when and how the incident(s) occurred. Specific information will allow OAI to properly investigate the alleged misconduct.

OAI will acknowledge receipt of a complaint as soon as possible, usually within 48 hours after its receipt.

There are no time limitations for reporting cases involving allegations of sexual harassment.

Other complaints of workplace harassment, abuse of authority or discrimination must be submitted to OAI by no later than one year after the last incident. OAI's Director has the discretion to accept a complaint after the time limit has passed in extraordinary circumstances.

To ensure process efficiency, OAI will further assess if a written statement in a standardized format is required.

 

3

Step

Conduct Assessment.

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

During the assessment, OAI will look at, inter alia, whether there is sufficient information to warrant a formal investigation and whether an investigation by OAI is the most appropriate action

To ensure process efficiency, OAI will further assess if a written statement in a standardized format is required

Decisions as to whether investigations should be pursued are made in accordance with the rules, policies and procedures of the Organization.

 OAI has the exclusive authority for determining whether to close a case or proceed with an investigation on the basis of OAI's assessment.

4

Step

Assessment decision

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

If OAI’s assessment indicates that the complaint falls within OAI’s investigative authority, that there is sufficient information to warrant a formal investigation, and that an investigation by OAI is the most appropriate action, an investigation will be initiated in accordance with the OAI Investigation Guidelines and the UNDP Legal Framework for Addressing Non-Compliance with UN Standards of Conduct.

 

 

OAI will prioritise cases of sexual harassment. It will conduct the investigation expeditiously within the constraints of available resources.

 

OAI will close the case when, for instance, there is insufficient evidence to warrant an investigation, the allegations do not fall within OAI’s mandate, or when an investigation by OAI is not the most appropriate action.

 

OAI will notify the complainant of the closure.

5

Step

Conduct investigation.

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

OAI will conduct its investigation in accordance with OAI’s Investigation Guidelines.

6

Step

Investigation reporting.

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

When the investigation is completed and it reveals enough evidence to reasonably conclude that misconduct has occurred, the investigator will prepare an investigation report in accordance with OAI’s Investigation Guidelines. The complainant is not entitled to receive a copy of the investigation report concerning allegations of misconduct against the investigation subject.

7

Step

Notify complainant and subject of outcome.

Responsible Party

OAI

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

OAI and/or the relevant authority will notify the complainant and the subject of the outcome of the investigation.

Harassment Informal Complaint Procedure

1

Step

Initiate informal dispute resolution.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes


An informal dispute resolution process can provide UNDP Personnel with the opportunity to resolve any complaints or grievances in an open, honest, non-threatening, and non-contentious manner. The informal options available to UNDP Personnel include: 

a) Approaching the alleged offender (self-initiated discussion); 
b) Support by a colleague/manager; or 
c) Consulting the Office of the Ombudsman for professional, impartial and confidential advice as to how to resolve the issue informally, including via mediation

 

1.1

Step

Approach alleged offender (self-initiated discussion).

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

A member of UNDP Personnel may not understand that he/she is being offensive and, if asked, may stop or alter his/her behaviour. UNDP Personnel who feel that they are being subject to any type of prohibited conduct are encouraged, where necessary, to inform the alleged offender, at the earliest point in time, that his/her conduct is unwelcome and request that such conduct cease.

1.2

Step

Seek support from a colleague/manager.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

UNDP personnel, including the affected person may request a colleague/manager to be present at a meeting with the alleged offender to let her/him know that his/her conduct is unwelcome and request that such conduct cease.

1.3

Step

Consult the Office of the Ombudsman.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

(i)The Office of the Ombudsman plays an important role when it comes to workplace related problems. UNDP Personnel may consult the Office if they feel harassed, and/or have witnessed an incident of harassment.  The services of the Office include listening and conflict coaching, identification and evaluation of options, facilitation of dialogue and mediation. The Office is a safe, confidential and informal place for the affected to express their concerns, and examine the various options in the dispute resolution process. The Office provides support within the informal process, informs on the procedures foreseen in the formal grievance process and makes appropriate referrals where necessary.

1.4

Step

Seek third-party neutral intervention.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Send an email to: ombudsmediation@fpombudsman.org

Third-party neutral intervention, particularly mediation, is a process whereby a third-party neutral with no stake in the outcome helps the parties whose lives are affected by a problem make decisions themselves that are mutually acceptable and which may resolve the problem. Mediation can also help prevent a recurrence of situations that cause conflict.

 

 

2.0

Step

Review progress with informal process and initiate formal process.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

If the affected person is not satisfied with the results of the informal process or if they wish to pursue the formal process immediately, they may submit a formal complaint to OAI at any time.

3.0

Step

Consult the Ethics Office.

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Send an email to:ethicsoffice@undp.org

UNDP Personnel may contact the Ethics Office for confidential advice and guidance on their options.

Grantees

1.0

Step

Establish grant selection committee (if different from project board and/or portfolio board).

Responsible Party

Project Developer and/or Portfolio Developer

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Low Value Grants Operational Guidance 
 



 

2.0

Step

Define grant selection criteria.

Responsible Party

Project Developer and/or Portfolio Developer

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Note that grant selection criteria are often determined or influenced by the funding source.

Low Value Grants Operational Guidance. 
 

2.1 OPT

Step

Conduct specific implementing partner capacity assessment for on-granting in line with the selection criteria.

Responsible Party

Project Developer and/or Portfolio Developer

Template/Guideline

The PCAT tool is a macro excel file which contains macros. To complete the download of the PCAT, please follow the quick guide under the explanatory notes.

Partner Capacity Assessment tool

Explanatory Notes

The partner capacity assessment tool has a worksheet for on-granting, which is enabled only when on-granting is used. (Quick Guide to Downloading the PCAT).  

3.0

Step

Solicit grant proposals in line with the project document and/or portfolio document.

Responsible Party

Project Manager

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Both the overall project and/or portfolio purpose and the grant selection criteria should be referenced.

Low Value Grants Operational Guidance
 

Grant proposals to include the signed Self Certification (Programming Entities)
 

4.0

Step

Selection of grantees and award of grants.

Responsible Party

Grant selection committee or project board and/or portfolio board

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The process of selection is described in the terms of reference of the grant selection committee.
 

Low Value Grants Operational Guidance
 

Grantees’ capacities are assessed through the Partner Capacity Assessment Tool, which assesses the grantee management and other capacities. The PCAT is completed for low value grants. (Quick Guide to Downloadingthe PCAT).
 

Responsible Parties

1.0

Step

Identify project activities and/or portfolio interventions to be provided by a responsible party.

Responsible Party

Project Manager and/or Portfolio Manager

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

2.0

Step

Select a suitable responsible party using the appropriate method.
 

Responsible Party

Project Manager and/or Portfolio Manager

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

3.0

Step

Screen the selected responsible party and complete any required capacity assessments instructed by the PCAT.
 

Responsible Party

Project Manager and/or Portfolio Manager

Template/Guideline

The PCAT tool is a macro excel file which contains macros. To complete the download of the PCAT, please follow the quick guide under the explanatory notes.

Partner Capacity Assessment Tool

Explanatory Notes

Partners’ capacities are assessed through the Partner Capacity Assessment Tool, which assesses the partner management and other capacities. The PCAT is completed for any implementing partner other than UN agencies. (Quick Guide to Downloading the PCAT).  
 
Financial capacities are assessed through the HACT micro-assessment if more than $150,000 is expected to be transferred in one year.
 

4.0

Step

Sign standard agreement with the responsible parties.

Responsible Party

Project Manager and/or Portfolio Manager

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Development and Institutional Effectiveness Project

1.0

Step
Approve annual workplan and budget.
Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The workplan and budget must be approved annually by the programme manager, or staff with Delegated Authority.

Development Project

1.0

Step

Appraise the quality of the project in the local project appraisal committee.

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Project QA Design and Appraisal User Guide (Quantum+)

Local project appraisal committee terms of reference.

For projects where UNDP serves as the managing agent for a CBPF, see the Country Specific Operational Manual for the CBPF.

2.0

Step

Update and approve the final quality assurance report in the Corporate Planning System.

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Project QA Design and Appraisal User Guide (Quantum+)

2.1 VERT

Step

Delegation of authority letter from the UNDP BPPS Vertical Fund Executive Coordinator to the Resident Representative.

Responsible Party

UNDP BPPS Vertical Fund Executive Coordinator

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

For all projects receiving GEF or GCF vertical funds.
 

See also the :

GEF RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed) for NIM projects. Note that additional quality assurance must be provided by BPPS/NCE for GEF and GCF projects as outlined in the RACI.

GCF RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed) for NIM projects
 
SOPs for Post-Approval Process of GCF Funded Projects

3.0

Step

Approve and sign the project document.

Responsible Party

Programme manager/Resident Representative, Government development coordination authority (as applicable), Implementing partner

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The agreement of the government development coordination authority can be acknowledged by any of the acceptable methods as agreed with government, including an exchange of letters or minutes of the LPAC.

4.0 ALT

Step

Approve and sign the initiation plan.

Responsible Party

Programme Manager/ Resident Representative

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Evidence that the government agrees to the initiation plan is required through meeting minutes, an exchange of letters or emails, or a signature on the initiation plan document.

5.0

Step

Apply the Output Markers and activate the project in Quantum

Responsible Party

UNDP Programme Officer

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

The multi-year workplan should be ‘mirrored’ in Quantum, so that there is a clear correspondence between the outputs and activities identified in the workplan, and the outputs and activities established in the system. Once the project has been approved by the local project appraisal committee, its proposal should be ‘awarded’ in Atlas. After the project ID is generated, multi-year budgets clearly indicating the responsible parties, funding sources, and planned budget amounts as per the annual workplan must be finalized. Each output under the project ID must also be linked to a relevant country programme outcome.

5.1 ALT

Step

Ensure the project is linked to the relevant portfolio in Quantum, if relevant.

Responsible Party

UNDP Programme Officer

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

This will enable joint project management, assurance and reporting features in Quantum and the corporate planning system.

6.0

Step

Sign contribution agreements with donors or memorandum of understanding for joint programme, as relevant.

Responsible Party

or staff with delegated authority

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

7.0

Step

Initiate the project.

Responsible Party

UNDP Programme Officer

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Agrees on project manager's responsibilities, as well as the responsibilities of other key members of the project management team.

Delegates any project assurance function as appropriate.

Reviews the progress report for the initiation stage (if an initiation plan was approved).

Reviews and appraises detailed project plans, including the multi-year workplan and Quantum reports covering activity definition, an updated risk log and the monitoring schedule plan.

Shares annual reports and relevant information on achievement of the outcomes with the programme board and outcome group.

OPT

Step

Advance authorization

Responsible Party
Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes
Subscribe to