Search
Policy Areas

Recently updated

Filter and Sort

Recently updated

Procurement protest is defined as any allegations made by an individual or entity with respect to failure of UNDP or any of UNDP staff to comply with relevant procurement procedures and uphold the basic principles and standards of integrity, transparency and fairness expected in the public procurement context. To be completed, the protest must contain the following information:The protestor’s name, address, telephone number and fax number;The solicitation or contract number, the name of contracting office;A detailed statement of all factual and legal grounds for the protest an ...

Procurement protest is defined as any allegations made by an individual or entity with respect to failure of UNDP or any of UNDP staff to comply with relevant procurement procedures and uphold the basic principles and standards of integrity, transparency and fairness expected in the public procurement context. To be completed, the protest must contain the following information:The protestor’s name, address, telephone number and fax number;The solicitation or contract number, the name of contracting office;A detailed statement of all factual and legal grounds for the protest and an explanation of how the protester was wronged;Copies of relevant documents supporting protester’s statement;A statement as to the form of relief;All information establishing that the protestor is an interested party for the purpose of filing a protest; andAll information establishing the timeliness of the protest.​

 New in Contract, Asset and Procurement Chapter:The purpose of Evaluation and Comparison of Offers is to ensure that the most qualified and responsive offer affords best value for money. Once a solicitation method and a forum for competition has been determined and tender documents distributed to potential Offerors, a Business Unit must ensure that adequate controls are in place for the receipt and evaluation of offers. Regardless of how effective each phase of the procurement process is executed, if the offers - quotations, bids or proposals - are not evaluated in a fair and transparent ...

 

New in Contract, Asset and Procurement Chapter:

The purpose of Evaluation and Comparison of Offers is to ensure that the most qualified and responsive offer affords best value for money. Once a solicitation method and a forum for competition has been determined and tender documents distributed to potential Offerors, a Business Unit must ensure that adequate controls are in place for the receipt and evaluation of offers. Regardless of how effective each phase of the procurement process is executed, if the offers - quotations, bids or proposals - are not evaluated in a fair and transparent manner, the overall process fails.​

​The Contract and Procurement Management chapter has been updated with the new procedures on Individual Contract (IC) that with immediate effect replace the Special Service Agreement (SSA) and the Reimbursable Loan Agreements (RLA) guidelines. The procedures have been designed to provide more clarity, simplification and standardization to the way UNDP deals with individual consultants and contractors. In order to effectively communicate the provisions of the new procedures, the Procurement Support Office of BoM will shortly develop and share with all offices a detailed Q&A note, orga ...

​The Contract and Procurement Management chapter has been updated with the new procedures on Individual Contract (IC) that with immediate effect replace the Special Service Agreement (SSA) and the Reimbursable Loan Agreements (RLA) guidelines. The procedures have been designed to provide more clarity, simplification and standardization to the way UNDP deals with individual consultants and contractors. In order to effectively communicate the provisions of the new procedures, the Procurement Support Office of BoM will shortly develop and share with all offices a detailed Q&A note, organize a webinar for procurement staff, as well as include sessions on the new procedures into regional and other training events.

​With this revised Policy, Delegated Procurement Authority for the management of ICs is USD 150,000 for all Business Units (over 100k, the case must be reviewed by Contract Assets and Procurement Committee.)​COs may have ICs with durations up to 24 months (over 24 months, Bureau Director or Resident Representative (if delegated) approval of duration is required) – though it is important to note that consultancies are typically recommended for short-term interventions, usually up to 12 monthsCOs may have IC daily fees up to USD 1,350 (over $1,350, RR approval is required with notification to th ...

​With this revised Policy, Delegated Procurement Authority for the management of ICs is USD 150,000 for all Business Units (over 100k, the case must be reviewed by Contract Assets and Procurement Committee.)​

  • COs may have ICs with durations up to 24 months (over 24 months, Bureau Director or Resident Representative (if delegated) approval of duration is required) – though it is important to note that consultancies are typically recommended for short-term interventions, usually up to 12 months
  • COs may have IC daily fees up to USD 1,350 (over $1,350, RR approval is required with notification to the Bureau Director).

The new approach under this policy takes into account the objectives of the programme or project; the scope, nature and value of the NGO/CSO engagement; the capacity of the NGO/CSO; and the level of development of the civil society (considering its NGO/CSO environment and availability). The policy also includes the following key features:Identification of relevant NGOs as Responsible PartyCapacity assessment-drivenRisk assessment-drivenUnique collaborative advantage to be determined against a project-specific ToRDesigned to engage CSOs that are not legally recognized, under specific circum ...

The new approach under this policy takes into account the objectives of the programme or project; the scope, nature and value of the NGO/CSO engagement; the capacity of the NGO/CSO; and the level of development of the civil society (considering its NGO/CSO environment and availability). The policy also includes the following key features:

  • Identification of relevant NGOs as Responsible Party
  • Capacity assessment-driven
  • Risk assessment-driven
  • Unique collaborative advantage to be determined against a project-specific ToR
  • Designed to engage CSOs that are not legally recognized, under specific circumstances.​​​

The security and safety of UNDP personnel is the highest priority in delivering UNDP's mandate around the world. Since 2004, UNDP has put in place an internal cost allocation mechanism to fund the corporate security costs.  At its meeting on 3 March 2016, the OPG authorized the central recovery of security and insurance costs related to Individual Contractors (ICs), thus treating them in a similar way to other UNDP contract holders. As a result, effective 1 April 2016, the following security charges at the same level as the rates for staff, UNV and SC holders will be applied to the professiona ...

The security and safety of UNDP personnel is the highest priority in delivering UNDP's mandate around the world. Since 2004, UNDP has put in place an internal cost allocation mechanism to fund the corporate security costs.  At its meeting on 3 March 2016, the OPG authorized the central recovery of security and insurance costs related to Individual Contractors (ICs), thus treating them in a similar way to other UNDP contract holders. As a result, effective 1 April 2016, the following security charges at the same level as the rates for staff, UNV and SC holders will be applied to the professional fees of ICs (excluding payments for travel and/or Daily Subsistence Allowance):4.25% for duty stations H, A, B & C6.25% in duty stations D & E.The above percentages are based on the capital city's hardship classification for the hiring Unit, and will be recovered by HQs on a regular basis against the budget(s) used for the payment of the IC. Therefore, all offices must ensure when planning that these costs are included in their project budgets (refer to Annex I for detailed guidance).

The requirement for Contracts, Assets and Procurement (CAP) Committee review was replaced with Direct Review by the CAP Chairperson for procurement actions valued between US$ 50,000 and US$ 150,000 (and US$ 75,000 for direct contracting). The CAP Chairperson may consult or request assistance from the Chairperson of the Regional Advisory Committee for Procurement (RACP) in reviewing any procurement action. If necessary, the CAP Chairperson, in consultation with the Head of Office, may escalate the case to the RACP Chairperson for his or her Direct Review. A full CAP Committee review is required ...

The requirement for Contracts, Assets and Procurement (CAP) Committee review was replaced with Direct Review by the CAP Chairperson for procurement actions valued between US$ 50,000 and US$ 150,000 (and US$ 75,000 for direct contracting). The CAP Chairperson may consult or request assistance from the Chairperson of the Regional Advisory Committee for Procurement (RACP) in reviewing any procurement action. If necessary, the CAP Chairperson, in consultation with the Head of Office, may escalate the case to the RACP Chairperson for his or her Direct Review. A full CAP Committee review is required only in those Country Offices that are granted an Increased Delegation of Procurement Authority (DPA) to review procurement actions valued between US$ 150,000 and the Increased DPA for competitive processes (and between US$ 75,000 and up to 50 percent of the Increased DPA for direct contracting). The quorum for a Committee was reduced from three members to two members, in addition to the Chairperson and/or Secretary.

The following provisions, which previously required Fast Track activation request are no-longer necessary (i.e. integrated into the main policies). a) The authority to grant the increase in Delegated Procurement Authority was devolved to Regional Chief Procurement Officers (RCPOs) in consultation with respective Regional Bureau Director for clearance. The respective RACP Chairpersons then will be responsible for obtaining technical inputs from relevant offices in assessing a request for increased delegation. b) Recognizing the reduction of risks through e-Tendering, the standard del ...

The following provisions, which previously required Fast Track activation request are no-longer necessary (i.e. integrated into the main policies).

a) The authority to grant the increase in Delegated Procurement Authority was devolved to Regional Chief Procurement Officers (RCPOs) in consultation with respective Regional Bureau Director for clearance. The respective RACP Chairpersons then will be responsible for obtaining technical inputs from relevant offices in assessing a request for increased delegation.

b) Recognizing the reduction of risks through e-Tendering, the standard delegated procurement authority of Resident Representative or head of a business unit in an office that systematically uses the e-Tendering has been raised from US$ 150,000 to US $200,000, based on the confirmation by the ACP Chairperson or respective Regional ACP Chairpersons.

a) Micro-purchasing
Country offices may request increasing the micro-purchasing threshold from US$ 5,000 to US$ 10,000 as part of their request for increase in delegated procurement authority. Please see Procurement Methods .

b) Request for Quotation (RFQ)
Offices are now authorized to issue RFQs in line with the following thresholds:
• For offices with micro-purchasing threshold of USD 5,000, the RFQ limit is US$ 5,000 ¬ US$ 149,999.
• For offices with micro-purchasing threshold of USD 10,000, the RFQ limit is US$ 10,000 ¬ US$ 149,999.

Pre-award negotiation is the process in which the business unit discusses certain aspects of the bid with the bidder who has been recommended for the award of the contract, with the aim of understanding the rights and obligations of both parties and to achieve a mutually beneficial agreement. Negotiation is not a mandatory step in a procurement process. It shall be undertaken on an exceptional basis, and shall be only initiated by UNDP subsequent to review of the procurement process by the relevant procurement authority and in accordance with this policy.The policy outlines the two types of ne ...

Pre-award negotiation is the process in which the business unit discusses certain aspects of the bid with the bidder who has been recommended for the award of the contract, with the aim of understanding the rights and obligations of both parties and to achieve a mutually beneficial agreement. Negotiation is not a mandatory step in a procurement process. It shall be undertaken on an exceptional basis, and shall be only initiated by UNDP subsequent to review of the procurement process by the relevant procurement authority and in accordance with this policy.

The policy outlines the two types of negotiations:

  • Substantive Negotiations: Should be fully justifiable, as they may significantly affect the scope of the requirements, terms and/or price beyond UNDP's right to vary the quantity up to 25 percent.
  • Non-Substantive Negotiations: Do not significantly affect the scope of the requirements, terms and/or price, and are within the right of UNDP to vary the quantity by 25 percent.

Price alone, under normal circumstances, should not be negotiated (especially in cases of open competition, which is designed to reflect true value for money). An exception can be made in a situation where the price quoted by the recommended offeror is deemed to be higher than market rates. Negotiation of price in Direct Contracting – When UNDP is evaluating only one offer, the price can and should be negotiated whenever necessary.