Search
Policy Areas

Performance Monitoring

1

Step

Hold regular check-in discussions with the supervisee about performance, provide feedback, and discuss support needs; record their results in the Quantum PMD module, as appropriate 
 

Responsible Party

Supervisor (initiative) Supervisee (participate, request)

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

While the supervisor is responsible for providing feedback to supervisees on performance, in line with the principle of mutual accountability for performance, supervisees should also proactively seek feedback on performance and indicate support and development needs​.
 
Records of the periodic reviews are strongly encouraged for all staff but optional. For staff with performance shortcomings, however, the supervisor must make a record of performance discussions and agreements on improvement, next steps, consequences, etc.

2

Step

Hold a formal mid-term review of the supervisee’s performance and record its results in the on-line PMD tool
 

Responsible Party

Template/Guideline
Explanatory Notes

Unless confirmed otherwise, the mid-term reviews of performance are expected to be conducted in July-August of the year​.
The record of the mid-term review in the on-line PMD tool should include an update on progress in the achievement of annual goals, confirmation of any modifications in the annual plan, if required, and brief feedback on performance to-date and support needs (the latter part is optional).
 
Detailed comments are required for supervisees with identified performance shortcomings. Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) should be attached to the mid-term reviews in the on-line PMD tool.
 
In case of matrix reporting, both direct and matrix supervisors should be part of the mid-term review discussion/decisions.