1 |
StepProduct Design |
Responsible PartyIssuing Office |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesThe issuing office identifies the need and elaborates the necessary details (intended impact, target audience, budget, roll out plans, etc.) to guarantee that the knowledge product is clearly justified, targeted and impactful.
For further information on knowledge product types, life cycle steps, production processes, and quality assurance standards, please see the Knowledge Product Production Guidelines. |
1.1 |
StepSubmit Product Details (Online) |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesThe focal point submits the new publication for approval. The focal point inputs in the online quality assurance form the justification for the product, the audience, the budget and other product details. See form sample. |
1.2 |
StepApprove product design |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesAfter the submission of Step 1 by the Focal Point, an email soliciting the approval of the new knowledge product is sent to the Approver. The Approver follows the link on the email to the online form and approve the knowledge product details or rejects it.
If the form is rejected, the workflow resumes from step 1.1., where the Knowledge Product Focal Point will review and address the Approver’s comments. |
2.0 |
StepProduce the knowledge product |
Responsible PartyIssuing Office |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesFollowing the approval of the knowledge product and its details, the issuing office can proceed to produce the product. All products, once finalized in draft, should be subject to critical review. The product’s type determines the nature of the review, the composition of the reviewers and whether an external review is called for. |
2.1 |
StepAssess quality standards (online) |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesClearing a knowledge product for publication is to certify that the product meets the quality standards set at Step 2 of the online quality assurance forms. This step is completed on the Knowledge Products Quality Assessment site. |
2.2 |
StepClearance for publication |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesFollowing the inputs submitted by the Focal Point on the online quality assurance forms, the Approver receives an email notification soliciting the clearance of the form.
If the form is rejected, the workflow resumes at step 2.1 of these procedures. The Knowledge Product Focal Point then reviews the Approver’s comments and corrects the issue. |
3.0 |
StepUpload the knowledge product |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesFollowing the Approver's clearance of the knowledge product, the Focal Point will complete “Step 3” of the online quality assurance form. This step is to guarantee that the product details, clearance process, and product itself are documented and uploaded for storage and audit purposes. |
3.1 |
StepPublish the knowledge product |
Responsible Party |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesThe KM Team (knowledge@undp.org) assists the Issuing Offices and Knowledge Product Focal Points in publishing quality approved knowledge products on UNDP’s public site. |
3.2 |
StepRoll out the product |
Responsible PartyIssuing Office |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesThe issuing office will continue to communicate and roll out plans as indicated in the product’s strategy and details. |
4.0 |
StepTrack product’s performance and impact |
Responsible PartyKnowledge Product Focal Point and Issuing Office |
Template/Guideline |
Explanatory NotesTrack and Monitor the impact of the knowledge product. Consult the Knowledge Product Report (Power BI) User Guide. |