When a project activity entails functions which require UNDP staff or other personnel for execution, but full-time contracting is not warranted, the project may source UNDP personnel indirectly employed for the project, who are located in the Country Office or any other UNDP location. Such service requirements, referred to as “delivery enabling services”, must be budgeted within each applicable project activity or function.
The Detailed annual review of the financial situation (Annex 1) presents a comprehensive review and analysis of UNDP activities at the global and aggregate levels from a financial perspective. An overview of the overall aggregates is shown in the narrative document and assesses funding performance by nature - regular resources, other resources - and provides a summary of the current year financial position of UNDP with prior year comparatives.
Category of costs associated with “programmes” and “development effectiveness” activities which contribute to the effective delivery of development results, as follows:
a) programmes: category of costs associated with specific programme components or projects that contribute to delivery of development results contained in country/regional/global programme documents or other programming arrangements;
b) development effectiveness: category of costs associated with activities of a policy, advisory, technical and implementation nature that are needed for achievement of the objectives of programmes and projects in the focus areas of the organizations. These inputs are essential to the delivery of development results, and are not included in specific programme components or projects in country, regional or global programme documents.
Under this modality, UNDP conducts expenditure from requisition through to disbursement with no cash being transferred to the Partner. However, the implementing partner has full programmatic control and so full control over expenditures.
A method of financing the budget of a partner country through a transfer of resources from an external financing agency to the national treasury of the partner government. The funds thus transferred are managed in accordance with the recipient’s budgetary procedures. This includes using the national regulatory framework for financial allocations, procurement and accounting systems.
Under this modality, UNDP advances cash funds on a quarterly basis to the Partner for the implementation of agreed upon programme activities. The Partner in turn reports back expenditure. Note that the recording of expenditures, from requisition through to disbursement, occurs in the books of the Partner. UNDP is pre-funding the activities with advances of cash.
Direct Implementation (DIM) is the modality whereby UNDP takes on the role of Implementing Partner. In DIM modality, UNDP has the technical and administrative capacity to assume the responsibility for mobilizing and applying effectively the required inputs in order to reach the expected outputs. UNDP assumes overall management responsibility and accountability for project implementation. Accordingly UNDP must follow all policies and procedures established for its own operations. In DIM modality, UNDP has the technical and administrative capacity to assume the responsibility for mobilizing and applying effectively the required inputs in order to reach the expected outputs. UNDP assumes overall management responsibility and accountability for project implementation. Accordingly UNDP must follow all policies and procedures established for its own operations.
This refers to the arrangement where payments are made directly to vendors and other third parties providing goods or services for agreed upon programme activities on behalf of the Partner upon request and following completion of the activities. Under this modality, the Partner is responsible/accountable for the project expenses and carries out the procurement actions, but requests UNDP to make the disbursements. The office provides accounting services and banking services to the Partner.
Direct Project Costing includes programme implementation and implementation support activities, costs incurred by UNDP to support project implementation. The pricing of inputs to UNDP projects & programmes should be based on actual costs for clearly identifiable services. There are three main options for implementing DPC: • Application of the CO workload study results, combined with multiple funding lines for posts • Application of the Universal Price Lists (UPL) or Local Price List (LPL) for transactional costs recovery • Creation and management of a stand-alone DPC project.
A system located on the Intranet and can be reached via the OFA website. Users will find a list of Procedures which they can select and navigate to a form where they provide the details of their request and to which they must attach the required documents. Following submission of the form(s), workflows associated with these tasks are automated to ensure appropriate controls, approvals and routing of documentation, as well as regarding service requests to enable the maintenance of their status by CO’s and HQ units. For Inventory Management, DMS serves as document depository which holds Inventory Control Reports and Certifications.
Depending on the archival value to the organization, organizational records fall into two categories: temporary and permanent files. UNDP's retention schedule complies with external Audit requirements. For Programme files the retention period is seven years following the completion of the project.