The AAA report is designed to provide Country Offices with a tool to analyze balance sheet accounts. The report gives details of all transactions from various modules for a given account and Operating Unit (OU) for a chosen period. The report selects activities from source systems (AP, AR, GL, etc.) within a fiscal year based on the posting date of the journal tied to the activity. The report can be run for the OU, specified on the run control. Country offices should run generally for one OU only. Upon select account 16005, this report provides all movements in the account by Operating Unit/ Project and or Fund for a specific accounting period.
An Accounts Payable invoice must be fully processed in order to be correctly recorded in Projects and the General Ledger (GL). An invoice needs to be fund reserved in order for it to record in budget control.An Accounts Payable (AP) voucher records a liability due to a vendor and expense against a given Chart of Account.
Ad-hoc services may be required or requested in certain circumstances, for instance the provision of legal advice or representation on an agreement or case,1 enhanced local security services for movement of cash in countries without banking facilities, or other services such as advisory support. Ad-hoc services are not included in the UPL and should be managed based on a Local Price List (LPL) or other locally negotiated prices using transparent, prevailing market rates or on the existing guiding costing methodology (Annex 1) and set out in a local price list and agreed locally between the parties.
Adjusted Risk Rating is defined as the Overall Risk Assessment derived from the Micro Assessment adjusted for other available information including: results of the Macro Assessment; past experience with the Partner, prior capacity assessments and micro assessments by other agencies.
Encompasses critical systems of internal control that complement and ensure the proper functioning of checks and balance, including financial ones. These include international civil service standards and incentives, ethics codes, criminal penalties, and administrative review.
Agency implementation is one of the four modalities available to UNDP for the implementation of projects and programmes. A UN agency may be either an Implementing Partner (accountable for the delivery of overall results in a programme or project) or a Responsible Party (accountable for delivery of elements of a programme or project).
A financial authorization issued by the Administrator to an official or to a unit to incur commitments for specific purposes relating to the institutional budget and within specified limits, during a definite period;
A subdivision of the appropriations for which a specific amount is shown in the appropriate decision and within which the Administrator is authorized to make transfers without prior approval;
The total amount approved by the Executive Board for specified purposes for the current institutional budget against which commitments may be incurred for those purposes up to the amounts so approved. The appropriations are divided into “appropriations lines”, for each of which a specific amount is shown in the appropriate decision adopted for each budget period by the Executive Board and within which the Administrator is authorized to make transfers without prior approval.
Deals with the preservation and maintenance of non-current records on a temporary or permanent/indefinite basis in accordance with an established retention schedule. The public record of UNDP should be electronic whenever possible, and should be stored in UNDP official systems.
In the HACT framework, these refer to planned activities used to determine whether funds transferred to implementing partners were used for their intended purpose and in accordance with the annual work plan.
A centralized process that auto-matches Quantum transactions against the bank statements loaded into Quantum via Treasury Management System (TMS) payment hub.
When a project activity entails functions which require UNDP staff or other personnel for execution, but full-time contracting is not warranted, the project may source UNDP personnel indirectly employed for the project, who are located in the Country Office or any other UNDP location. Such service requirements, referred to as “delivery enabling services”, must be budgeted within each applicable project activity or function.
The Detailed annual review of the financial situation (Annex 1) presents a comprehensive review and analysis of UNDP activities at the global and aggregate levels from a financial perspective. An overview of the overall aggregates is shown in the narrative document and assesses funding performance by nature - regular resources, other resources - and provides a summary of the current year financial position of UNDP with prior year comparatives.
Category of costs associated with “programmes” and “development effectiveness” activities which contribute to the effective delivery of development results, as follows:
a) programmes: category of costs associated with specific programme components or projects that contribute to delivery of development results contained in country/regional/global programme documents or other programming arrangements;
b) development effectiveness: category of costs associated with activities of a policy, advisory, technical and implementation nature that are needed for achievement of the objectives of programmes and projects in the focus areas of the organizations. These inputs are essential to the delivery of development results, and are not included in specific programme components or projects in country, regional or global programme documents.
Under this modality, UNDP conducts expenditure from requisition through to disbursement with no cash being transferred to the Partner. However, the implementing partner has full programmatic control and so full control over expenditures.
A method of financing the budget of a partner country through a transfer of resources from an external financing agency to the national treasury of the partner government. The funds thus transferred are managed in accordance with the recipient’s budgetary procedures. This includes using the national regulatory framework for financial allocations, procurement and accounting systems.
Under this modality, UNDP advances cash funds on a quarterly basis to the Partner for the implementation of agreed upon programme activities. The Partner in turn reports back expenditure. Note that the recording of expenditures, from requisition through to disbursement, occurs in the books of the Partner. UNDP is pre-funding the activities with advances of cash.
Direct Implementation (DIM) is the modality whereby UNDP takes on the role of Implementing Partner. In DIM modality, UNDP has the technical and administrative capacity to assume the responsibility for mobilizing and applying effectively the required inputs in order to reach the expected outputs. UNDP assumes overall management responsibility and accountability for project implementation. Accordingly UNDP must follow all policies and procedures established for its own operations. In DIM modality, UNDP has the technical and administrative capacity to assume the responsibility for mobilizing and applying effectively the required inputs in order to reach the expected outputs. UNDP assumes overall management responsibility and accountability for project implementation. Accordingly UNDP must follow all policies and procedures established for its own operations.
This refers to the arrangement where payments are made directly to vendors and other third parties providing goods or services for agreed upon programme activities on behalf of the Partner upon request and following completion of the activities. Under this modality, the Partner is responsible/accountable for the project expenses and carries out the procurement actions, but requests UNDP to make the disbursements. The office provides accounting services and banking services to the Partner.
Direct Project Costing includes programme implementation and implementation support activities, costs incurred by UNDP to support project implementation. The pricing of inputs to UNDP projects & programmes should be based on actual costs for clearly identifiable services. There are three main options for implementing DPC: • Application of the CO workload study results, combined with multiple funding lines for posts • Application of the Universal Price Lists (UPL) or Local Price List (LPL) for transactional costs recovery • Creation and management of a stand-alone DPC project.
A system located on the Intranet and can be reached via the OFA website. Users will find a list of Procedures which they can select and navigate to a form where they provide the details of their request and to which they must attach the required documents. Following submission of the form(s), workflows associated with these tasks are automated to ensure appropriate controls, approvals and routing of documentation, as well as regarding service requests to enable the maintenance of their status by CO’s and HQ units. For Inventory Management, DMS serves as document depository which holds Inventory Control Reports and Certifications.
Depending on the archival value to the organization, organizational records fall into two categories: temporary and permanent files. UNDP's retention schedule complies with external Audit requirements. For Programme files the retention period is seven years following the completion of the project.